Hi jim,
   You've probably blocked me by now, but
   On Wed, Aug 11, 2021, 6:56 PM jim bell <[1]jdb10987@yahoo.com> wrote:

   The problem, briefly stated, is "How do you defend a country based on
   anarchistic or libertarian principles, if they cannot tax themselves to
   put on a defense?"

   The money and labor rise from people who value defense.  This value is
   clear when the danger is clear.
   AP is a little similar to a culture I heard of among indigenous people
   in canada.  There is a nation of them who do not provide for outsiders
   to trespass on their land.  The punishment for trespass is death, and
   that's just a part of their shared culture and has been for as long as
   anybody knows, so the entire nation would be familiar with supporting
   it.  When living off the land, if the ecosystem is mistreated (e.g.
   overhunted by a neighbor), your families die, so managing the impact of
   others has been important.
   But jim and I disagree on the result of money.  I think I see
   supporting unlimited wealth as oppressive and jim sees it as freeing,
   not sure.  Regardless you probably need some kind of financial
   government to provide for unlimited wealth, since people as a whole
   only have so much demand.  Most people don't want advertisements in
   their search results, and those ads produce a lot of unnatural demand.

References

   1. mailto:jdb10987@yahoo.com