On Thu, Jul 29, 2021, 7:00 AM grarpamp <[1]grarpamp@gmail.com> wrote: On 7/27/21, Karl <[2]gmkarl@gmail.com> wrote: > This is going on right now at [3]https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=LV0FjpKcCBQ . > > Whistleblowing is lawful and can be safe with the aid of a lawyer. [4]https://whistlebloweraid.org/ Nothing of note seems to have changed as a result of the case and people that that organization advertises as their model case. In part because the whole case got censored scrubbed pasted over non-disclosured blacked out secreted away and thus bored the media and public to death. Has that always been the situation [or not] with such official channels and cases... will it continue to be [or not]? You decide. "Safe" does not necessarily imply effective. Activism always entails risk. See similar: [5]https://intelexit.org/ [6]intelexit.org aids people in leaving national security and includes whistleblowing I think this is Raddack's (lawyer of us gov whistleblowers including Snowden and Hale) organization: [7]https://whisper.exposefacts.org/ I once encountered a whistleblowing organization about a specific suspect corporation, that was actually a honeypot. That doesn't seem likely true of [8]exposefacts.org given their high profile cases. References 1. mailto:grarpamp@gmail.com 2. mailto:gmkarl@gmail.com 3. https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=LV0FjpKcCBQ 4. https://whistlebloweraid.org/ 5. https://intelexit.org/ 6. http://intelexit.org/ 7. https://whisper.exposefacts.org/ 8. http://exposefacts.org/