On Thursday, July 15, 2021, 01:13:49 AM PDT, grarpamp wrote: [1]https://thefreethoughtproject.com/federal-court-rules-its-unconstitu tional-to-ban-18-20-year-olds-from-buying-guns/ [2]https://www.washingtonpost.com/context/read-the-ruling-4th-circuit-p anel-says-gun-laws-barring-sales-to-people-under-21-are-unconstitutiona l/565124e9-70d1-4e47-b060-3087ce9eadaa/ [3]https://thefreethoughtproject.com/charges-dropped-father-shooting-of ficer/ >Federal Court Rules It Unconstitutional To Ban 18-To-20-Year-Olds From >Buying Guns I've long believed that the 2nd Amendment was intended to guarantee the gun-law environment that existed in 1791, when the 2nd was ratified. That's why it didn't describe in detail what that right amounted to. The Founding Fathers knew that the legal environment was well- documented, in state laws, and would remain documented. So, any new kinds of laws on guns or arms invented after 1791 were unconstitutional, literally an "infringement" on RTKBA. Jim Bell References 1. https://thefreethoughtproject.com/federal-court-rules-its-unconstitutional-to-ban-18-20-year-olds-from-buying-guns/ 2. https://www.washingtonpost.com/context/read-the-ruling-4th-circuit-panel-says-gun-laws-barring-sales-to-people-under-21-are-unconstitutional/565124e9-70d1-4e47-b060-3087ce9eadaa/ 3. https://thefreethoughtproject.com/charges-dropped-father-shooting-officer/