On Sat, Jul 3, 2021, 3:24 PM Punk-BatSoup-Stasi 2.0 <[1]punks@tfwno.gf>
   wrote:

     > >         "video shows the crew firing on a group of men and
     killing several
     > >         of them, then laughing at some of the casualties, all of
     whom were
     > >         civilians, including two Reuters journalists."
     > > > >
     > > >
     > > > Firewalls are deadly.
     > >
     > >
     > >         not sure what 'firewall' you're referring to - your
     comment seems
     > > unrelated to the post's content.
     > >
     >
     > When you get in the way of communication, you can often stop
     things from
     > shooting you, but they still figure out they need to shoot
     something.
             I still don't know what you are talking about.

   I still don't know what you are talking about, either, I'm afraid.  And
   neither do whistleblower prosecutors know what the whistleblowers are
   talking about.  That stuff is what I'm talking about.

     > >
     > >         By the way you said the US is a 'democracy' so I guess
     you're
     > > responsible for US 'democracy' murder and torture too?
     > >
     >
     > Everyone is responsible.
             if you mean every US government criminal and their
     supporters, yes. Otherwise your reply is meaningless diversion and
     US propaganda.

   I have received an expression from your email address that could be
   effectively turned to itself.  That doesn't mean it's false about other
   things, too, but I'm not sure why anyone would say it.

             So again, although you're replying to the message, you don't
     seem to be paying attention to the fundamental facts that the
     messages contains, namely the completely criminal nature of your
     government and your country.

   The things I'm receiving from you don't make very meaningful sense to
   me.  I have in the past received things that are almost certainly
   different from what people have sent me.
   For example, I tried to support two different groups once.  From one I
   was buying a t-shirt.  I received in reply my check undeposited and a
   written message "fuck you".  It is pretty unlikely that this person,
   selling t-shirts, had been represented to me honestly by their webpage,
   received what I sent as intended, and replied to it in that manner.
   What you say is so obvious.  Maybe we could just pick one fact and
   repeat it a lot, rather than throwing poop?

References

   1. mailto:punks@tfwno.gf