On Wed, Jun 16, 2021, 6:24 PM grarpamp <[1]grarpamp@gmail.com> wrote:

     "rdohm: the EFF in conjunction with the Chaos Computer Club
     announced a new secure Instant Messenger called: GoldBug"
     "rdohm: We all need to evaluate this and will come back to you"
     > You have to audit the code to claim it is faulty.
     No one ever claimed the code was faulty,
     only that the group was and is still doing things that
     are disreputable... lying about nonexistent press

   ??? if the code is not faulty then why are you talking about unsigned
   messages as if they are related to anything?
   go get an signed message, and then talk about what you are talking
   about -- people, not software -- once you can demonstrate they actually
   did what you say.

     releases to con users into using it, censoring user
     inquiries, refusing to code signing reproducibility, dodging
     and faux-assert-confirm based redirecting tactics instead of
     simply answering simple questions, and questionable
     actions and methods irregular to usual work in the field...
     all documented on the internet, which people are too lazy to
     follow, to lazy to even get a copy of the PR from the EFF CCC.
     The advice has always been to audit code.
     Many people won't bother using or auditing
     any codes that come from groups that have
     disreputed themselves... that works for them.

   It is well known that disruptors disrepute groups for no fault of their
   own.  I will be reading 1 more reply from your email address for now.

     Regardless... Expect Ops.

   People will protect themselves when you can use cryptographic
   signatures to get through the ones shilling us to you.

References

   1. mailto:grarpamp@gmail.com