On Wed, Jun 9, 2021, 6:53 AM Karl <[1]gmkarl@gmail.com> wrote:

   [appropriate joke]
   PGP seems pretty suspicious, too, no?  Also POSIX?
   [/appropriate joke]
   I don't know why I'm receiving expression from you guys of such poor
   information.
   What can this cypherpunks list do for either you, or your mitm if that
   is the reason for the poor information?

   So, the reason I responded this way was because the information didn't
   show anything suspicious to me.  The reasons for suspicion were a press
   release that wasn't included, and various behaviors that seem tiny to
   me.
   Meanwhile a lot of people's personally identifying information was
   being shared, when these people were running, using, and advocating an
   open source encrypted network .  Most of the documents are sharing
   personal details on the people found related to the network.  This can
   get people very hurt in my opinion; but I infer it is just there so
   that other people can continue the work and figure out what is real.
   It seems to hard to figure out if that press release is real unless the
   dev says it is.

References

   1. mailto:gmkarl@gmail.com