Hey Greg, I got your email. Thanks for speaking to me. On Thu, May 20, 2021, 10:30 PM Greg Newby <[1]gbnewby@pglaf.org> wrote: I updated the Subject line and broke the thread for the below: On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 07:28:12PM -0400, Karl wrote: > Hey Greg, > > > Personally, I don't think this is necessary. The nature of the cypherpunks > > list is that people offer their thoughts, knowledge, links, criticism, etc. > > Your contributions are generally on-topic for the list, so I don't think > > there's a reason to downplay yourself. > > Are you receiving what I'm writing? Yes. > What do you think of this? > > [spam][spam] i tied myself to a table leg again and i want to talk about how boss's striatum > > wire just feels _so_ _great!_ be scared and aggressive around people different from you! > > if i sell you some spam, will you let me buy some of yours? [spam][spam] I think it was off the general list topics. As in, not very related to the cryptoanarchist topics we're allegedly here for. However, I didn't think it was spam. Maybe that's just me: SPAM is more or less equivalent, in my mind, to unsolicited commercial email (UCE). We barely get any of that on the cypherpunks list. These are often things I don't want to say, or are said when I do not want to say them. From brainwashing. [spam] helps me have ease by helping me feel better spamming the list. And if people filter around [spam] instead of around me, they might hear me when I have something important to say, if I can learn to differentiate well again. Regarding UCE, commercial email is not only about selling products. Hopefully that's clear to a community like this? Being a paid troll is a huge thing now. BTW, the old archives at [2]https://lists.cpunks.org are filled with UCE. > Compared to this? > > Hey does anybody have any tips on learning rust on an airgapped machine? Cargo just > > keep frustrating me so much. Is there a crate mirror anywhere? If I made one, would > > anybody else use it? I found the discussion about whether rusted iron filings are magnetic to be completely within bounds for the cypherpunks list. Again, that's just my opinion. Rust is a newer systems programming language, at a glance to me it looks like it is trying to be secure. >>If you are truly posting something that is off-topic, then an "[offtopic]" > >Iindicator or similar might be a good way to indicate that. > > I can maybe switch to thatt change what I was expressing but my input dialog box is moving my > cursor all around and it is very hard to navigate, so sending as is. > sorry about this.[spam]> honestly I was "trained" to disrupt > communities like this and I want to give people a clear way to protect > themselves from that disruption a little., when I can figure it out. > at all. Without trying to speak for anyone but myself: Do as you please with the subject headings. I was merely suggesting that the [spam] tag probably isn't needed, in my view. Trying to disrupt cypherpunks is sort of a cottage industry around here. When disruption is the norm, it makes disruption tougher to do! Greg Or easier but yeah ... Uhh ... I have severe problems preserving and accessing information. That might be why a lot of [spam] ends up here. I need a way to store feelings without losing them, somewhere. References 1. mailto:gbnewby@pglaf.org 2. https://lists.cpunks.org/