Greg, can you clarify whether or not the list is doing spam filtering?

   On Thu, Apr 29, 2021, 1:49 PM lolwut <[1]lolwut9001@cock.li> wrote:

     Spam detection software, running on the system "[2]mail.pglaf.org",
     has identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original
     message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
     similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
     the administrator of that system for details.
     Content preview:
     Content analysis details:   (4.3 points, 4.0 required)
      pts rule name              description
     ---- ----------------------
     --------------------------------------------------
     -1.9 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
                                 [score: 0.0000]
     -0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
      1.3 RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET RBL: Received via a relay in
                                 [3]bl.spamcop.net
                  [Blocked - see
     <[4]https://www.spamcop.net/bl.shtml?37.120.193.123>]
      0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED  RBL: ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to
                                 DNSWL was blocked.  See

     [5]http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block
                                  for more information.
                                 [37.120.193.123 listed in
     [6]list.dnswl.org]
     -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2      RBL: Average reputation (+2)
                                 [37.120.193.123 listed in
     [7]wl.mailspike.net]
      1.3 RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL  RBL: Relay in Validity RPBL,

     [8]https://senderscore.org/blocklistlookup/
                                [37.120.193.123 listed in
     [9]bl.score.senderscore.com]
     -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS          SPF: HELO matches SPF record
      0.1 DKIM_SIGNED            Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not
     necessarily
                                 valid
     -0.1 DKIM_VALID             Message has at least one valid DKIM or
     DK signature
     -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU          Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature
     from
                                 author's domain
      0.8 RDNS_NONE              Delivered to internal network by a host
     with no rDNS
      2.8 DOS_OUTLOOK_TO_MX      Delivered direct to MX with Outlook
     headers
     ---------- Forwarded message ----------
     From: lolwut <[10]lolwut9001@cock.li>
     To: <[11]cypherpunks@lists.cpunks.org>
     Cc:
     Bcc:
     Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2021 13:48:29 -0400
     Subject: RE: Dan Kaminsky Dies from Vaccine
     -----Original Message-----
     From: cypherpunks [mailto:[12]cypherpunks-bounces@lists.cpunks.org]
     On Behalf Of
     Shawn K. Quinn
     Sent: Wednesday, 28 April, 2021 9:36 PM
     To: [13]cypherpunks@lists.cpunks.org
     Subject: Re: *SPAM* RE: DAN KAMINSKY DIES FROM VACCINE
     >On 4/28/21 16:50, lolwut wrote:
     >> Shawn, you should take a look at [link removed]
     >I looked at it, and it looks like the typical conspiracy theory
     horseshit.
     >COVID-19 is real, it can definitely kill you, and it is definitely
     "not
     just the flu". Thankfully, the pandemic (note, no "l") appears to be
     almost
     over.
     >--
     >Shawn K. Quinn <[14]skquinn@rushpost.com>
     >[15]http://www.rantroulette.com
     >[16]http://www.skqrecordquest.com
     It's fine that you disagree, and it's fine that you call it
     "conspiracy
     theory horseshit", but don't be a dick and deliberately tell
     everyone that
     you've removed (read: censored) the link with "[link removed]" when
     quoting
     my previous message.
     [17]https://digdeeper.neocities.org/ghost/corona.html You
     can trim out quoted sections for purposes of brevity, of course, but
     it's
     clear in this instance that that wasn't your aim.
     [18]https://digdeeper.neocities.org/ghost/corona.html In prior
     messages with
     Punk, I recall, you also seemed quite keen in obsessively and
     condescending
     "correcting" his messages when quoting him (e.g., if he wrote "jew",
     you
     would replace it with "[Jew]") as a cheap and easy way to look like
     the
     smart one. [19]https://digdeeper.neocities.org/ghost/corona.html
     Even if you don't agree with the statement of the author of that
     page that
     the coronavirus isn't real, that isn't the entire content of the
     page.
     [20]https://digdeeper.neocities.org/ghost/corona.html I personally
     think that it
     is real, and that it can kill you, but not any more than the
     seasonal flu;
     and that, regardless of its actual danger, the lockdowns cannot be
     justified. [21]https://digdeeper.neocities.org/ghost/corona.html

References

   1. mailto:lolwut9001@cock.li
   2. http://mail.pglaf.org/
   3. http://bl.spamcop.net/
   4. https://www.spamcop.net/bl.shtml?37.120.193.123
   5. http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block
   6. http://list.dnswl.org/
   7. http://wl.mailspike.net/
   8. https://senderscore.org/blocklistlookup/
   9. http://bl.score.senderscore.com/
  10. mailto:lolwut9001@cock.li
  11. mailto:cypherpunks@lists.cpunks.org
  12. mailto:cypherpunks-bounces@lists.cpunks.org
  13. mailto:cypherpunks@lists.cpunks.org
  14. mailto:skquinn@rushpost.com
  15. http://www.rantroulette.com/
  16. http://www.skqrecordquest.com/
  17. https://digdeeper.neocities.org/ghost/corona.html
  18. https://digdeeper.neocities.org/ghost/corona.html
  19. https://digdeeper.neocities.org/ghost/corona.html
  20. https://digdeeper.neocities.org/ghost/corona.html
  21. https://digdeeper.neocities.org/ghost/corona.html