On Fri, Apr 2, 2021, 4:04 PM lolwut <[1]lolwut9001@cock.li> wrote:

     that it, in effect, makes illegal

   I'm a bit confused by the whole concept of "cancel culture".  You
   describe it as free speech being made "in effect illegal" by people
   expressing their concerns (eg, in this case calling for RMS to be
   removed from the board).  But aren't they just as free to speak their
   concerns, as the speech that created the concerns?  And isn't the board
   fully within their rights to listen to the those concerns and weigh
   them in their decisions?
   Basically, is this actually a few speech issue, or do you just disagree
   with the perfectly legal decisions of the board, who are listening to
   the perfectly free feedback and concerns of the public?
   David

References

   1. mailto:lolwut9001@cock.li