On Sat, Dec 26, 2020, 7:16 PM grarpamp <[1]grarpamp@gmail.com> wrote:

     > We need to
     Not doing that has caused problems.
     People can own nothing and be happy,
     if that's what you want, and everyone else leaves your
     community alone. Hardly could it be done under the above
     linked governments that seek to own everything
     and dole out your happy. Nor hardly beside people
     that won't leave you alone. Enclaves of ownership
     and non-ownership could probably coexist and interoperate
     so long as they don't physically cross with arms over
     the river NAP between them. No one but entropy
     knows which form would survive longer. Look to biology,
     it's full of non forms lacking sentience, and this rock
     is full already. Good luck.

   Sounds like we agree and it is very hard to talk about it.  We keep
   talking about small things we disagree about instead.
   Anyway, ownership and non-ownership are basically the same thing:
   people NEED to be able to live by  personal agreements they make with
   their neighbors and families.  We can't have huge organisations forcing
   clothes off of or on to our backs.

References

   1. mailto:grarpamp@gmail.com