I'm on my phone.  I'm not consenting to being away from my attempt to
   blockchain my emails regarding trying to find a brainwashing
   therapist.  Sounds like I'll want to find one who's good with
   publishing the recordings, too.
   On Fri, Dec 25, 2020, 2:48 PM coderman <[1]coderman@protonmail.com>
   wrote:

     ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
     On Friday, December 25, 2020 7:19 PM, Punk-BatSoup-Stasi 2.0
     <[2]punks@tfwno.gf> wrote:
     > ...
     > did you sign one?
     no, however i have asked for the SF-86's from the OPM hack to be
     publicly dumped - this

   I'm not familiar with SF-86 or OPM.  Do you mean that, even though you
   haven't agreed to anything, that after something you've done, how you
   communicate may have changed or could change?

     would allow for open source projects working on privacy enhancing
     technologies to avoid potential conflicts of interest or subterfuge
     from contributors.

   You're saying that if we supported your request (maybe by showing it is
   important and making that very public), it would basically protect from
   severe disruption in a way generalizeable to all open source efforts?

     still waiting on that dump, of course :)
     best regards,

References

   1. mailto:coderman@protonmail.com
   2. mailto:punks@tfwno.gf