Twitter censoring Post’s Hunter Biden exposé is ‘election interference’: GOP le
aders

 [1]https://nypost.com/2020/10/17/twitter-censoring-posts-biden-expose-is-electi
on-interference-gop/

 Jim Bell's comments:. They are correct.  If Russia buying $6 million of Faceboo
k ads in 2016 constitutes "election interference", then what Facebook and Twitte
r have done easily exceeds that in scope and seriousness.


American election laws ostensibly protect against companies and corporations mak
ing "campaign contributions".  If a newspaper or magazine gives free ad space to
 a candidate, that's an illegal contribution.  But what if Twitter obstructs a n
ews story about Biden's illegal dealings with Ukraine?  Not merely refusing to r
un the news story itself, but actually prevents people from linking to the story
?

Twitter is clearly giving a valuable benefit to Biden's camp, but thinking it is
 allowed to do so.  They will suddenly discover they have made an illegal campai
gn contribution, at least according to the arguments which were used against the
 Citizens United v. FEC Supreme Court decision a few years ago.  Oh, the irony !
   Whether or not the Citizens United decision actually legalized this, they wil
l have to explain how many more contributions they will openly make.

References

   1. https://nypost.com/2020/10/17/twitter-censoring-posts-biden-expose-is-election-interference-gop/