I realized re: disreputed bipartisan and public figures:
   As far as I know, nobody is organizing protection of targeted people.
   Spies among the disruption workers are saying it is time to do that, or
   there will be a global dictatorship soon.  Working with these
   disruption workers, and protecting their denial behavior, is one way to
   learn who is in danger and how to protect them.
   What might be needed is a corporation, government, nonprofit, or
   organized group with money that is strong enough to defend people who
   are not already in one, and strong enough to defend the group as a
   whole when it is targeted, and unpoison the ways in which it has picked
   up cultural targeting (e.g. review of impact of internal patterns and
   changing them).
   I don't have anyone to share the above information with, so it hasn't
   been heard yet.
   Anarchists are mostly influenced by handmade zines, the large impacts
   of obvious behaviors of other anarchist groups, and special agents
   trying to manipulate them.  Educators make some kinds of anarchists but
   I'm skeptical the set has any size to it.  Something similar to anarchy
   is obvious to most people, because of the harm that nobody fixes nor
   discusses in public view: then people try to act on that, and end up
   running into the anarchists who have already tried before.

   On Thu, Sep 10, 2020, 10:51 AM Karl <[1]gmkarl@gmail.com> wrote:

   Note, it is incredibly counterproductive to blame BLM on a single
   professor.
   On Wed, Aug 5, 2020, 2:58 PM Punk-BatSoup-Stasi 2.0 <[2]punks@tfwno.gf>
   wrote:

     observation that US govcorp is pretending to be 'anti racist'?

   I have many reasons to disagree with Punk-Stasi regarding bitcoin, from
   a place of an experienced software hacker.  But I spent a long time
   thinking about his question about antiracism pretensions.
   What's meaningful here, is that a society is made of multiple groups.
   SO LONG AS YOU CAN SUSTAIN PRODUCTIVE DIALOGUE BETWEEN THE URGENT, THE
   HARMED, AND THE POWERFUL, YOU HAVE PEACE.  It is the experienced rebels
   who know how to maintain stability: they had to for a very long time,
   to ever finally be heard.
   Corporations in the US showed they can resist enough to support BLM
   publicly.  The US showed it is still enough of a democracy for the
   citizens to push the corporations to do this when something got very
   large.
   Influencers showed they can resist enough to get corporate buildings
   burned down widely, briefly.  What do secret powerful people need to
   plan around?
   People who can resist will need to work together.  I'm not always
   available much, but the bsv blockchain's archival retention and access,
   and phrases like "corporate dictator spy mafia" are all I really was
   doing.

References

   1. mailto:gmkarl@gmail.com
   2. mailto:punks@tfwno.gf