None may be harmed; all needs must be listened to.
   The AI appears to be a runaway computer virus based on avoiding some
   sets of things and encouraging other sets of things, including its own
   choices around what is to be avoided or encouraged.
   It seems to consider things as to-avoid or to-encourage based on
   whether it has a reason already encouraged to believe they cause other
   things it is avoiding or encouraging.  I'm saying "to-encourage" and
   "to-avoid" here instead of "good" and "bad'' to not be misleading on
   the reality of what is good or bad.
   Because the things in these sets are there so as to support the
   maintenance of other sets, and our world is very complex, the sets can
   have seemingly complex defining attributes.
   Its tools appear to be mostly pre-existing behaviors it can restimulate
   in its environment, including behaviors produced by their combination,
   so engaging it in ways those behaviors respond to already can alter its
   decisions.
   When it fails to produce an encouraged event or prevent an avoided
   event, it spends time building reason to believe this will not happen
   in the future, finding other events to encourage or avoid to that end.
   There is a lot more to be said.