It sounds like you are discussing how to repair world culture, and none
   of us are on the same page.
   On Fri, Jun 12, 2020, 10:44 AM \0xDynamite
   <[1]dreamingforward@gmail.com> wrote:

     > > > > We all know now what COVID-19 (nCov, Coronavirus) is.
     > > >
     > > >         No 'we' don't. 'covid' is a global fascist PSYOP, but
     you prentend to not know it.
     > >
     > > That is a very real working hypothesis I've been working on.  I
     tend
     > > to see that Satan is behind it, but it is effectively
     > > indistinguishable.
     >
     > OK Marxos, a jot of homework for ya, please do tell us where the
     word Satan comes from, and don't chicken out on us either.
     It likely comes from the shibboleth named "GOD" produced by
     Christians
     and their errors,
     > > What the punk-stasi is saying is that by looking for cases you
     provide
     > > legitimacy to it.  And legitimacy in a propaganda campaign is
     > > advocacy, for that is what the propagandist seeks.
     >
     > That is true, and further, that somewhere high up, some smallish
     number of actual humans actually discussed and at one point actually
     decided to run this massive virus drill, and to run it as
     realistically as possible.

   Such people are real people we can talk to.  And when they go away they
   may be replaced by something more extreme, because of the trackable,
   understandable, enumerable cultural pressures making the situations.
   You see here one of the merits of the coronavirus scare: you are
   thinking about why it is was made, and asking others to.

     Well, there is one other possibility.  It was witnessed by myself:
     the "cabal" at the top of the "illuminati" and the all-seeing-eye
     was
     actually a machine (hence the term shibboleth) ran by prophesy that
     had already been circumvented and co-opted, yet still intact.  This
     was holding the right side of the thing.  After liberals erected gay
     men as superior to GOD, the media machine was held by them (for the
     servce of MAN, perhaps, yet still....).
     > > >         surveillance already exists and you're RECOMMENDING
     that it be used to deal with a non-existent 'threat'. You are
     SUPPORTING surveillance by pathetically lying about its
     'usefulness'.
     > >
     > > While there might be a case for surveillance in some benevolent
     > > society, it is WAY too much power to the governors in a cracked
     > > society like this.   But IF THERE IS SURVEILLANCE, give access
     to the
     > > People to balance and check the power being given to government.
     >
     > Hard to disagree that folks have a right while in public, to make
     recordings of what they see and hear...
     Except, that the tech used to do so (including the optics) is beyond
     most men and women's abilities to produce or explain.  That means
     that
     it is a higher force that they're using to get those capabilities.

   Your phrase "higher force" is misleading for readers here who believe
   they understand or could understand the workings (which we all could
   but is unwise to do).
   I'm imagining people upset at having someone give or teach them to
   build a device that shows where all the tech is and offers a way to
   disable it, because they are so scared of tech already.  In my area so
   many people have cellphones they would have no qualms about implanting
   a nanitegrenade in their children and their brains if a trusted source
   said to.
   For technodominant cultures, natural intuition and experience, which
   can be enumerated, tracked, and understood, but are disregarded, seem
   like magic.  But many more people get hurt when technodominant people
   are scared.

     marxos

References

   1. mailto:dreamingforward@gmail.com