On Friday, January 10, 2020, 06:40:28 AM PST, John Newman
   <jnn@synfin.org> wrote:

   On January 10, 2020 12:40:38 AM UTC, jim bell <[1]jdb10987@yahoo.com>
   wrote:
   >
   >
   >On Thursday, January 9, 2020, 03:13:21 PM PST, Punk-Stasi 2.0
   ><[2]punks@tfwno.gf> wrote:
   >
   > On Thu, 9 Jan 2020 22:10:23 +0000 (UTC)
   >jim bell <[3]jdb10987@yahoo.com> wrote:
   >
   >>>  [twice in the last couple of hours I sent this,
   >
   > >   yes, we got it THREE TIMES
   >
   >>
   >  [4]https://lists.cpunks.org/pipermail/cypherpunks/2020-January/07886
   5.html
   >
   >[5]https://lists.cpunks.org/pipermail/cypherpunks/2020-January/078867.
   html
   >
   >[6]https://lists.cpunks.org/pipermail/cypherpunks/2020-January/078869.
   html
   >
   >>    you can check the archive before needlessly resending
   >
   >>But I only got it ONE TIME.  And, I notice that nobody else replied
   >>before the third time.  So far, you're the only one who claim you got
   >>it more than once.    Let's get some confirmation.
   >>                Jim Bell
   >To add to the spam - I got it three times.
   >His point was you could look at the archives, if it's in the archives
   you can feel quite confident that it made it to the list. And if was in
   the archives.... Three times.
   But TWO times it WAS NOT SENT TO ME!  THAT is the failure of which I am
   complaining.  That is a discrete claim of a defect which, so far,
   nobody in a position seems to be interested in solving.
   The reason I was signed up to receive those special confirmations is
   that a few months ago, the same thing happened to me.
              Jim Bell
                  Jim Bell

References

   1. mailto:jdb10987@yahoo.com
   2. mailto:punks@tfwno.gf
   3. mailto:jdb10987@yahoo.com
   4. https://lists.cpunks.org/pipermail/cypherpunks/2020-January/078865.html
   5. https://lists.cpunks.org/pipermail/cypherpunks/2020-January/078867.html
   6. https://lists.cpunks.org/pipermail/cypherpunks/2020-January/078869.html