On Monday, November 11, 2019, 02:32:00 PM PST, Razer <g2s@riseup.net>
   wrote:

   >Spoken like the nasty capitalist you are. Wtf are you doing on an
   Anarchist list child?
   As far as I can see, "capitalism" and "anarchy" should go quite well
   together.  You know, "anarcho-capitalist".
   "Capitalist" should merely mean "crowdsourced capital", although I
   think it has become (wrongly) used in a way suggesting it is a synonyn
   for "free market".  (It is not necessarily that.)   I think "free
   market" requires the possibility of "capitalism".
   "Capitalism" generally gets a bad name from "crony-capitalism" which is
   actually a thing.  But you can't have the 'crony' part unless you find
   the improperly-used power from somewhere, and that is from the
   government.  Make the government very small, or even non-existent, and
   there will be very little power that can be misused to support
   businesses unfairly.
   Those fools who say, 'Government will protect us from those evil
   corporations!' need to think again.  Who do they think is ALLOWING
   those corporations to do what they do?  And can making that government
   bigger be expected to help, or hurt?
                   Jim Bell