https://www.newyorker.com/news/q-and-a/a-penn-law-professor-wants-to-ma
   ke-america-white-again

   >Whether or not something is âracistââI put it in heavy quotes, because
   I think it is a protean term, it is a promiscuous term, it is a term
   thatâs trotted out as a mindless bludgeon, whatever. The question is,
   is it true? And, in fact, itâs emblematic of sliding toward Third
   Worldism that we now have this dominant idea that to notice a reality
   that might be quote-unquote âracistâ is impermissible. It canât be
   true.

   This is a spectacular answer. Beyond proving that she values literacy
   or any other transient knowledge (there will always be more words) over
   knowledge with some sort of lineage, she invents a new word âThird
   Worldismâ as a purely strawman ideology.

   Naturally as Mohammed Ali says âThey never called me, âniggerââ, racism
   does exist. Although, oddly enough, I doubt a professor is capable of
   rhetoric.

   The above paragraph is incorrect, it is refuting an argument she has
   not made. The verbosity and vagueness would enable any opponent to
   focus on the part âit canât be trueâ. So what is she arguing? Even that
   is unclear other than signaling she is vapid with no firmly well
   thought out beliefs.

   I have no doubt she is being interviewed for her insights, whatever
   those may be.

   Sent from ProtonMail Mobile