On Wednesday, August 14, 2019, 12:37:48 AM PDT, grarpamp
   <grarpamp@gmail.com> wrote:
   [1]https://github.com/Enegnei/JacobAppelbaumLeavesTor/blob/master/Jacob
   AppelbaumLeavesTor.md
   Some elements are now in court, there are a number
   of people filing statements, here is one of them...
   [2]https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cand.340308/gov.usc
   ourts.cand.340308.25.0.pdf
   For Exhibits A through P, run the 0.pdf from 1.pdf through 16.pdf .
                           UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
                         NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
                                 OAKLAND DIVISION
   PETER TODD, an individual,          Case No. 4:19-cv-01751-DMR
               Plaintiff,
                                       DECLARATION OF JACOB APPELBAUM
         v.                            IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF'
                                       OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT'S SPECIAL
   SARAH MICHELLE REICHWEIN aka        MOTION TO STRIKE PLAINTIFF'S
   ISIS AGORA LOVECRUFT, an            COMPLAINT (ANTI-SLAPP MOTION)
   individual,
                                       Date:    August 22, 2019
               Defendant.              Time:    1:00 p.m.
                                       Location: Courtroom 4
                                       Complaint Filed: April 3, 2019
   [snip]
   Jim Bell's comment:
   It looks like the defendant is confused, claiming "SLAPP" (Strategic
   Lawsuit against Public Participation) status.
   See:
        [3]https://www.gofundme.com/f/isis-lovecruft-legal-defense
   "On July 15, 2019, Lovecruft filed [4]an anti-SLAPP motion , asking the
   Court to dismiss Todd’s lawsuit.  “SLAPP” is an acronym for Strategic
   Lawsuit Against Public Participation. California’s anti-SLAPP law
   enables the Court to weed out lawsuits brought to punish citizens for
   engaging in free expression on matters of public concern, such as
   discussions of predatory male behavior in
   the [5]#MeToo and [6]#TimesUpera of hopeful awakening."     [end of
   quote]
   See:
   [7]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strategic_lawsuit_against_public_parti
   cipation

   I feel quite certain that the anti-SLAPP laws would not be applicable
   in the case of a libel lawsuit.   From what I read (and I wasn't aware
   of this case before) Lovecruft accused Todd of rape.   That accusation,
   if false, would clearly be libelous,    Libel is an exception to free
   speech in the First Amendment.  Maybe it shouldn't be, but at least as
   of now libel is actionable.
                Jim Bell

References

   1. https://github.com/Enegnei/JacobAppelbaumLeavesTor/blob/master/JacobAppelbaumLeavesTor.md
   2. https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cand.340308/gov.uscourts.cand.340308.25.0.pdf
   3. https://www.gofundme.com/f/isis-lovecruft-legal-defense
   4. https://github.com/lovecruft-case-documents/docs/blob/master/anti-SLAPP-motion.pdf
   5. https://twitter.com/search?q=#metoo
   6. https://twitter.com/search?q=#timesup
   7. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strategic_lawsuit_against_public_participation