I found the [1]https://intelexit.org/ website unconvincing. There is
   only one argument that can be made against any genuinely oppressive
   institution (funny how examinations into the why in history has never
   lead to any workable suggestions other than don't do it again).

   So here is the one argument: If the principles or ideals that your
   institution represents are legitimate, why is there excessive secrecy,
   or does your institution only believe loyal individuals can understand
   their policies or goals?

   On a side note, what is the legal culpability of someone who wasn't on
   the radar of an investigation, is alleged to be involved by a third
   party already admittedly unreliable due to lies, as a result, the first
   party faces the full brunt of an investigation for a decade while the
   third party goes off scott free? This is one of self-evident
   impropriety things.

   Sent with [2]ProtonMail Secure Email.

References

   1. https://intelexit.org/
   2. https://protonmail.com/