I can't understand why anyone, who really wanted to use PMs to remove
   from power a person they object to, would call for harm (and create a
   lightening rod for regulation and law enforcement) when then they could
   just as easily wager on whether that person would, for example, still
   hold that position on a certain date. This would not at all imply a
   call for violence as the wager, and the intent, could reasonably
   otherwise be satisified.

   On Fri, Aug 3, 2018, 2:13 PM juan <[1]juan.g71@gmail.com> wrote:

     On Fri, 3 Aug 2018 13:43:18 -0700
     Steven Schear <[2]schear.steve@gmail.com> wrote:
     > If AP markets persist, become effective and go "mainstream" they
     should be
     > considered a RLT (Radical Leveling Technology).
             What remains to be seen is an ordinary gambling system
     turning into a true 'prediction' market.
             For instance, if you listen to fake-libertarians,
     true-fascists you'll hear how the 'amazing' futures markets
     'predict' the weather and similarly retarded stuff.
             A gambling system in which some people can actually *decide*
     what the future will be is different but it remains to be seen if
     the incentives will be enough to motivate those people to act AND
     even if they are motivated, if they will be able to accomplish
     whatever needs to be accomlished. Like getting rid of bezos,
     zukerberg, google, warret buffett, goldman sachs, and all the rest.

References

   1. mailto:juan.g71@gmail.com
   2. mailto:schear.steve@gmail.com