Freenet seems to work when you predominantly or solely use private/dark
   peers.

   On Thu, Aug 2, 2018, 4:28 PM Mirimir <[1]mirimir@riseup.net> wrote:

     On 08/02/2018 04:14 PM, Steven Schear wrote:
     > "Augur’s creators claim they don’t have control over what its
     users choose
     > to do with the protocol—or the ability to shut it down. This
     creates a
     > problem that is “endemic” to blockchain technology, says Wright,
     who
     > recently co-wrote a book on the subject: “If you do not have a
     very
     > concrete intermediary—i.e., a company or group of people that are
     running
     > the marketplace—how do you apply laws and prevent that activity
     from
     > occurring?”
     >
     > This is, as they say in marketing, not a problem but a feature.
     Yep. I mean, that's the fucking point!
     But I gotta say, they need to work on the anonymity aspect. The
     argument
     that participation anonymity doesn't matter, as long as adversaries
     can't attribute stuff, is weak. Look at Freenet, for example.
     > On Thu, Aug 2, 2018, 3:55 PM jim bell <[2]jdb10987@yahoo.com>
     wrote:
     >
     >>
     >>
     [3]https://www.technologyreview.com/s/611757/this-new-ethereum-based
     -assassination-market-platform-could-cause-napster-size-legal/
     <SNIP>

References

   1. mailto:mirimir@riseup.net
   2. mailto:jdb10987@yahoo.com
   3. https://www.technologyreview.com/s/611757/this-new-ethereum-based-assassination-market-platform-could-cause-napster-size-legal/