On 02/07/2017 05:44 PM, jim bell wrote:

   Anarchist:  Non-believer in government, at least government as we
   currently understand it.
   Libertarian:  Believer in the Non-Aggression Principle.  (NAP;
   [1]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non-aggression_principle
   Your statement implies that "Libertarian" NECESSARILY amounts to the
   'approval of governing forces.'
   Even that has a problem:  What is your definition of "governing
   forces"?

   Your "Non-Aggression principles (not that I believe Libertarians
   possess such a thing as fixed principles) only apply to the other
   psychopaths like you. For as long as necessary. No longer. That's what
   I've seen in practice (since I first observed such a thing as
   'Libertarianism' in... was it the late 1970s?) and action IS THE ONLY
   THING that matters. EVERYONE writes shit down. Ask any Indigenous
   person on the North American continent what that writing's worth.
   Further, Feudalism is a form of government and Libertarians, when they
   aren't busy being Economic Republicans with Democrat social morals
   (fwtw) are Feudal... Absolutely. The argument is always "The biggest
   guns win" also belying your so-called NAP So does your  "Assassination
   Market. How "Non-Agressive"
   You're full of shit.

References

   1. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non-aggression_principle