Wrong thread >
   [1]https://theintercept.com/2016/11/29/something-happened-to-activist-e
   mail-provider-riseup-but-it-hasnt-been-compromised/

   On 2017-01-20 05:44, Razer wrote:

   On 01/19/2017 08:11 PM, grarpamp wrote:

[2]https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13007234

Not as if anything should be thought untouchable.



   I saw something on a twitter feed related to them that said they would
   be updating it and not to worry and this info is old.
   Have you checked?
   Check test 1 2...
   gpg --verify canary-statement-signed.txt
   gpg: Signature made Mon 15 Aug 2016 10:01:19 PM PDT using RSA key ID
   139A768E
   gpg: Good signature from "Riseup Networks [3]<collective@riseup.net>"
   gpg:                 aka "Riseup Treasurer [4]<treasurer@riseup.net>"
   gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature!
   gpg:          There is no indication that the signature belongs to the
   owner.
   Primary key fingerprint: 4E07 9126 8F7C 67EA BE88  F1B0 3043 E2B7 139A
   768E
   The canary hasn't been updated but the gpg output still shows a good
   sig (assuming)
   They could still kill the canary be revoking the key, and they haven't
   done that.
   See: [5]https://riseup.net/en/canary
   Rr

References

   Visible links
   1. https://theintercept.com/2016/11/29/something-happened-to-activist-email-provider-riseup-but-it-hasnt-been-compromised/
   2. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13007234
   3. mailto:collective@riseup.net
   4. mailto:treasurer@riseup.net
   5. https://riseup.net/en/canary

   Hidden links:
   7. mailto:collective@riseup.net
   8. mailto:treasurer@riseup.net