On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 10:08 PM, Mirimir <[1]mirimir@riseup.net>
   wrote:

     On 11/18/2016 02:55 PM, Shawn K. Quinn wrote:
     > On 11/18/2016 03:44 PM, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
     >> Once known as the "free speech wing of the free speech party",
     Twitter's
     >> true colours are hard to hide for even those with slowest
     brainial
     >> neorone.
     >>
     >> Facebook to follow and Google joining the party.
     >
     > I wouldn't call them "alt-left" just because they want the garbage
     off
     > of their service. There is a difference between free speech and
     garbage.
     Well, ACLU has supported rights of KKK to rally :)

   Aye, but they've not also given them a section on their blog to post on
   have they?
   If you look a little deeper, you'll also find it's not the fundamental
   views (and expression of) themselves that Twitter have taken issue
   with, it's that the users in question repeatedly violated the ToS.
   There's really not that much wrong with an individual service provider
   deciding there are rules if you want to use their service. There might,
   of course, be some chilling effects if all players in that area decide
   to enforce overly strict rules, but that's somewhat different.
   As ever, XKCD is relevant - [2]https://xkcd.com/1357/
   --
   Ben Tasker
   [3]https://www.bentasker.co.uk

References

   1. mailto:mirimir@riseup.net
   2. https://xkcd.com/1357/
   3. https://www.bentasker.co.uk/