From: Александр <afalex169@gmail.com>
   2016-09-17 21:06 GMT+03:00 jim bell <[1]jdb10987@yahoo.com>:

     Can the name of the network be "Password is password"?

   >Hold a second, Jim...i'm on the phone with the senior judge from the
   European Court now. Well, the judge says
   <<Yeah. the name of the network could also be "FuckTheState">>,  he
   claims.
   <<The only condition is.... to REVEAL it to the state.
   >In the "rest" - you are totally fRRRee! :)>>
   I think it's unfortunate that people can't "automatically" share some
   of their (otherwise unused) WiFi capacity.  Many people would do this,
   as long as a few restrictions are in place: 1.   A person sharing
   shouldn't be legally liable for anything done;  2.  The owner gets to
   use "all" of the capacity when needed; the external user only gets
   space when available.   3.   The IP addresses of "his" use and that of
   the "external" use be unrelated in any way.
   Interestingly, Comcast/Xfinity has a somewhat automatic system of this
   kind:  Boxes are called "gateways" and, in effect, have two WiFi
   routers:  One for the owner and the other for anyone else.  (However,
   to use the other side, you need to be a subscriber somewhere or have
   his password/permission.)  For news of an objection to this, see:
   [2]https://www.fastcompany.com/3039682/comcast-was-sued-for-quietly-mak
   ing-your-homes-internet-part-of-the-sharing-economy

           Jim Bell

References

   1. mailto:jdb10987@yahoo.com
   2. https://www.fastcompany.com/3039682/comcast-was-sued-for-quietly-making-your-homes-internet-part-of-the-sharing-economy