Better still would be a way for any number of list servers to co-exist
   without delivering multiple copies of mail.
   This would allow anyone to set up another server at will and add
   robustness to the system.
   Is this already in existence or a new idea, is it even a valid idea?

   On 23 August 2016 10:46:14 GMT+01:00, Zenaan Harkness
   <zen@freedbms.net> wrote:

On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 11:07:51AM +0300, Georgi Guninski wrote:

     On Sat, Aug 20, 2016 at 03:51:23PM -0700, Riad S. Wahby wrote:

     Folks,
     After 15+ years running a cypherpunks node, it's quitting time for
     me.
     I plan to delete the mailman aliases on September 30th.
     If anyone is interested in migrating the list to his or her machine
     before then, that would be great; let's discuss on-list.

     So far I saw two offers to host the list after 30.Sep.
     IMHO two or more future lists won't hurt. Everyone can set a
     cypherpunks list (but won't get the past reputation of this one, if
     any).

     Is there a way to set up two or three email servers acting in
     concensus,
     basically mirrormiring each other, but not duplicating emails to the
     subscribers?
     That way there'd be less time pressure when one person wants to move
     on
     (Riad, you're a gentleman - thank you again.)

   --
   Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.