On 05/15/2016 02:53 PM, The Doctor wrote: On Sat, 14 May 2016 02:02:26 -0300 juan [1] wrote: > Well, isn't that as bloated as firefox...? Even worse > since it also has mail, irc, an html editor(...) etc. [drwho@windbringer ~]$ cd /usr/bin/ [drwho@windbringer bin]$ ls -alF firefox seamonkey lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 24 Jan 6 20:35 firefox -> /usr/lib/firefox/firefox* lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 33 Dec 6 16:12 seamonkey -> /usr/lib/seamonkey-2.39/seamonkey* [drwho@windbringer bin]$ ls -alF /usr/lib/firefox/firefox /usr/lib/seamonkey-2.39/seamonkey -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 150720 Jan 6 20:35 /usr/lib/firefox/firefox* -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 121848 Dec 6 16:12 /usr/lib/seamonkey-2.39/seamonkey* Oh, and just for fun, here's Palemoon's ([2]https://www.palemoon.org/) disk footprint: [drwho@windbringer bin]$ ls -alF /usr/lib/palemoon/palemoon -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 240720 Apr 30 21:18 /usr/lib/palemoon/palemoon* > Pale moon worked well for me using Windoze, which it's optimized for. It's memory control did not seem to be as good with the Mint/Lubuntu distro I installed on that same machine. HOWEVER at the time I was using an older single core machine that the later V of Palemoon didn't work with because of a chipset instruction not available in the Turlon64 chip. I never did try it with a later CPU and a recent Palemoon release.. References 1. mailto:juan.g71@gmail.com 2. https://www.palemoon.org/