+Cpunks
   ---------- Forwarded message ----------
   From: Travis Biehn <[1]tbiehn@gmail.com>
   Date: Sun, Oct 11, 2015 at 10:25 PM
   Subject: Re: How to go about sharing (was: one of a dozen threads about
   Cryptome)
   To: Michael Best <[2]themikebest@gmail.com>
   Unnecessary for what threats? Who is the arbiter / granter of authority
   on 'copyright' or 'DMCA' takedowns? What is this 'violation'? Do I, as
   an oppressive regime worker, simply need to put 'Copyright the TLAs,
   all rights reserved" next to my TS stamp to keep it off your website?
   Hosting over HTTP(s) provides neither anonymity, nor metadata
   anonymity. There isn't much you can do to change this, except loudly
   inform your userbase of these properties, provide them with mechanisms
   to ensure the integrity of the resource and provide alternative
   protocols which possess these desired qualities.
   How do you attest to the data provenance, your attestation or guarantee
   of integrity AND completeness?
   Archive.org is not 'censorship resistant'.
   -Travis
   On Sun, Oct 11, 2015 at 10:11 PM, Michael Best
   <[3]themikebest@gmail.com> wrote:

   Thoughts - All good advice in it's own way, but mostly it seems
   unnecessary. Aside from copyright and reprint issues, 99% of what's on
   Cryptome is not only open source, it's not really objectionable in
   terms of hosting it.
   TheCthulhu does a great job of distributing large amounts of data, but
   that's it's own thing and requires an ongoing budget and
   infrastructure.
   I figure with Archive.org I can distribute 99.9% of material and not
   worry about copyright, bandwidth, etc. If it turns out there's a
   violation I missed, the item gets taken down - not the entire site or
   all the uploads. On the rare occasion that there's something else, I'd
   rather take whatever steps are needed to distribute it then rather than
   try to build my own independent infrastructure ahead of time.
   Things to add? Holes to poke in my logic?

     On Mon, Oct 12, 2015, at 12:32 PM, Travis Biehn wrote:
     > You can start by re-posting the leaked traffic logs... (Editorial
     > discretion is frowned upon amongst the idealists.) >
     > Maybe set up an onion, host on i2p, freenet (hehehe), ethereum,
     the > blockchain, torrents. Spread it far and wide, set up a PKI,
     set up a > WOT, keep it all offline. >
     > If you're a real masochist you'll host the docs on some crazy >
     'website' with no indirection protecting you from legal/illegal/TLA
     > action. Keep the info off the dark web, off the deep web and in
     the > search indexes. >
     > Warrant canary (which won't work), encryption (you won't be safe)
     and > signatures (secrets will be stolen.) >
     > If you think you can survive as well as JYA, Deb & fare better
     than > Assange, go for it. Be prepared. >
     > It doesn't pay very well. You'd have to be crazy to do this. Or
     you can be like TheCthulhu and run your own data centre with
     good lawyers. Alfie

   --
   [4]Twitter | [5]LinkedIn | [6]GitHub | [7]TravisBiehn.com | [8]Google
   Plus
   --
   [9]Twitter | [10]LinkedIn | [11]GitHub | [12]TravisBiehn.com |
   [13]Google Plus

References

   1. mailto:tbiehn@gmail.com
   2. mailto:themikebest@gmail.com
   3. mailto:themikebest@gmail.com
   4. https://twitter.com/tbiehn
   5. http://www.linkedin.com/in/travisbiehn
   6. http://github.com/tbiehn
   7. http://www.travisbiehn.com/
   8. https://plus.google.com/+TravisBiehn
   9. https://twitter.com/tbiehn
  10. http://www.linkedin.com/in/travisbiehn
  11. http://github.com/tbiehn
  12. http://www.travisbiehn.com/
  13. https://plus.google.com/+TravisBiehn