Yep. Thought tacit acknowledgment in first answer was clear, but like
   it was lost in translation as too often happens with email. My fault.
   Ad hominem anticipation was in response to the bombing comment.

   On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 10:18 AM, Georgi Guninski
   <[1]guninski@guninski.com> wrote:

     On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 10:14:57AM -0400, Michael Best wrote:
     > Here's the windup... and the pitch...
     > It looks like it's gonna be an ad hominem!
     > Best doesn't swing at it. Ball one.
     >
     In case you can't understand the question, are you this?:
     [2]https://twitter.com/NatSecGeek
     According to:
     [3]http://www.dailydot.com/politics/cryptome-ip-leak-john-young-mich
     ael-best/

References

   1. mailto:guninski@guninski.com
   2. https://twitter.com/NatSecGeek
   3. http://www.dailydot.com/politics/cryptome-ip-leak-john-young-michael-best/