The list had been involved since the first post about the GCHQ slide. The list was no help at all. Sorry you don't approve, Cari, but what's done is done. The list was consulted and no help. John Young refused to acknowledge the problem - or fix it. [sarcasm] But what's terribly wrong is that I reported it - not that John leaked it or lied it about it when he kept denying it or anything else. [/sarcasm] Cari Machet [1]carimachet@gmail.com Sat Oct 10 04:51:59 EDT 2015 Still michael best you could have consulted the list here That someone calls you a liar therefor you act is an ego based mindset Answer why you decided to not consult this list that has profoundly smart beings on it You could have asked this list for help we are interested in helping with such matters i would say and you could have done so without revealing info ... did this never cross your mind ? If it never even crossed your mind to consult us i find there is something terribly wrong On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 12:01 AM, coderman <[2]coderman@gmail.com> wrote: On 10/9/15, Michael Best <[3]themikebest@gmail.com> wrote: > ... *they never would've been published. * i find it useful to think of voice. published yes, with little voice. now it's most certainly a loud something! the published always was, however... References 1. mailto:carimachet@gmail.com?Subject=Re: [cryptome] Re: [cryptome]&In-Reply-To= 2. mailto:coderman@gmail.com 3. mailto:themikebest@gmail.com