Cryptome just deleted all the quoted tweets for some reason. Weird,
   right? Well, here are the archived versions.
   [1]http://web.archive.org/web/20151009203031/https://twitter.com/Crypto
   meorg/status/652581186036989953
   [2]http://web.archive.org/web/20151009204359/https:/twitter.com/Cryptom
   eorg/status/652585088912355328
   [3]http://web.archive.org/web/20151009204359/https://twitter.com/Crypto
   meorg/status/652581918215684096
   [4]http://web.archive.org/web/20151009203916/https:/twitter.com/Cryptom
   eorg/status/652583921352355840
   [5]http://web.archive.org/web/20151009210749/https://twitter.com/Crypto
   meorg/status/652579919340421120
   Looks like I forgot to archive
   [6]https://twitter.com/Cryptomeorg/status/652582251805474816. Oh well.
   You get the idea.
   On Fri, Oct 9, 2015 at 4:51 PM, Michael Best <[7]themikebest@gmail.com>
   wrote:

   Here is Cryptome's full set (so far) of post-admission replies. I'm
   unable to make anything consistent out of it.
   "Admission of leaked logs" is rather generously overstated of what we
   specifically understated.
   [8]https://twitter.com/Cryptomeorg/status/652581186036989953
   Me: You understated things? As in, left something(s) out??
   Cryptome: Told what was needed to defuse your exaggeration and resist
   your demands to auth visitors.
   [9]https://twitter.com/Cryptomeorg/status/652585088912355328
   Note that Cryptome doesn't dispute the email that I quoted, which was
   copy and pasted in it's entirety.
   Rigged and disinfo remain valid. You overstated the disclosure. Leaking
   is press exaggeration.
   [10]https://twitter.com/Cryptomeorg/status/652581918215684096
   Nothing is ever deleted, that is subterfuge to escape culpability. You
   ratted Cryptome visitors. Not the first or last.
   [11]https://twitter.com/Cryptomeorg/status/652582251805474816
   *Note that Cryptome is definitely NOT using subterfuge to escape
   culpability or advising users of the data
   leak/breach/compromise/whatever spin word Cryptome wants to use.
   Still refusing to validate what you faked, rigged and released. And
   will not, it's your story, run with it.
   [12]https://twitter.com/Cryptomeorg/status/652583921352355840
   Our claims remain valid despite the biased cherry-picking so beloved of
   childish argumentum ad hominem -- Cicero's bitch.
   [13]https://twitter.com/Cryptomeorg/status/652579919340421120

   On Fri, Oct 9, 2015 at 4:45 PM, coderman <[14]coderman@gmail.com>
   wrote:

     On 10/9/15, Michael Best <[15]themikebest@gmail.com> wrote:
     > ...
     > Not sure how I was right AND the info is rigged and disinfo...
     QUANTUMSQUIRREL casts suspicion, just like shade, too.

References

   1. http://web.archive.org/web/20151009203031/https://twitter.com/Cryptomeorg/status/652581186036989953
   2. http://web.archive.org/web/20151009204359/https:/twitter.com/Cryptomeorg/status/652585088912355328
   3. http://web.archive.org/web/20151009204359/https://twitter.com/Cryptomeorg/status/652581918215684096
   4. http://web.archive.org/web/20151009203916/https:/twitter.com/Cryptomeorg/status/652583921352355840
   5. http://web.archive.org/web/20151009210749/https://twitter.com/Cryptomeorg/status/652579919340421120
   6. https://twitter.com/Cryptomeorg/status/652582251805474816
   7. mailto:themikebest@gmail.com
   8. https://twitter.com/Cryptomeorg/status/652581186036989953
   9. https://twitter.com/Cryptomeorg/status/652585088912355328
  10. https://twitter.com/Cryptomeorg/status/652581918215684096
  11. https://twitter.com/Cryptomeorg/status/652582251805474816
  12. https://twitter.com/Cryptomeorg/status/652583921352355840
  13. https://twitter.com/Cryptomeorg/status/652579919340421120
  14. mailto:coderman@gmail.com
  15. mailto:themikebest@gmail.com