I found the logs on the USB before I posted about the GCHQ slide,
   that's how I found the info. I verified that the data was also in
   coderman's torrent from over a year ago. John rebuffed my initial
   inquiry and refused to verify that the IPs I provided visited Cryptome
   at the times listed, and then accused me of faking the data. So I
   released it for others to look at themselves.
   As far as calling Snowden a liar, as I said in note #4 of the GCHQ
   post...

     If the slide is a mockup, it could be an internal mockup produced by
     GCHQ, a deliberate piece of disinformation from within or without
     GCHQ, a document altered by Snowden, his friends/"friends" in
     Russia, or anyone else in the chain of custody. Given that Snowden
     didn't review all of the documents he handed over, he might not
     recognize if one had been altered, embellished, forged, or taken out
     of context prior to publication. Or it could be genuine - proving
     that something could be a fake isn't quite the same as proving it's
     a fake.

   Italics added.

   On Thu, Oct 8, 2015 at 11:37 AM, Georgi Guninski
   <[1]guninski@guninski.com> wrote:

     On Fri, Oct 02, 2015 at 10:23:12PM -0400, Michael Best wrote:
     > A few days ago, a new Snowden slide
     >
     <[2]https://theintercept.com/2015/09/25/gchq-radio-porn-spies-track-
     web-users-online-identities/>
     > was
     > released that appeared to show that the GCHQ was monitoring
     Cryptome in
     Dude, are you calling Snowden liar?
     And did you found out that allegedly cryptome shipped their web logs
     on
     usbs to buyers AFTER you called Snowden liar?

References

   1. mailto:guninski@guninski.com
   2. https://theintercept.com/2015/09/25/gchq-radio-porn-spies-track-web-users-online-identities/