Lovely,
   I'm interested in the insanity that would ensue from trying to get
   'these populations' to agree on priorities for development efforts.
   -Travis

   On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 10:21 AM, oshwm <[1]oshwm@openmailbox.org>
   wrote:

     On 07/10/15 14:25, Travis Biehn wrote:
     > Normalizing / randomizing is fine. Anonymity sticks out, hasn't
     learned to
     > blend in.
     >
     > Keyboard timing is way down the list gentlemans. If you want to
     avoid it,
     > get drunk every time you use a webapp.
     Fair point, has anyone ever produced a peer agreed priority ordered
     list
     of privacy and anonymity threatening devices or software etc
     classified
     with either solved/not solved?
     It's a simple stupid question and I probably know the answer but is
     it
     something needed so that globally all activists/coders/etc can work
     through it?

   --
   [2]Twitter | [3]LinkedIn | [4]GitHub | [5]TravisBiehn.com | [6]Google
   Plus

References

   1. mailto:oshwm@openmailbox.org
   2. https://twitter.com/tbiehn
   3. http://www.linkedin.com/in/travisbiehn
   4. http://github.com/tbiehn
   5. http://www.travisbiehn.com/
   6. https://plus.google.com/+TravisBiehn