Bittorrent's stuff is always closed and obscure. Don't trust. Ages back I live-tweeted (topical!) my explorations into BTSync back when they were claiming 256 bit AES. Suffice toto say.. no. They were using AES256 with a 20-something-byte key..base32 encoded. I don't even. They'll happily advertise security while not even grasping that entropy doesn't increase with encoding overheads. On 30 September 2015 17:27:00 IST, Steven Schear wrote: Has anyone here looked into [1]http://blog.bittorrent.com/tag/maelstrom/ ? It would seem to offer some DDoS and other protections. On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 11:53 AM, Georgi Guninski <[2]guninski@guninski.com> wrote: On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 08:13:09AM +0100, Oshwm wrote: > It is behind Cloudflare's MiTM service which adds web services names to their existing certs as alternative Names. > > So your SSL/TLS connection is terminated on Cloudflare's web application firewalls and NOT the web servers that you think is terminating it. > lol, did CA based PKI (d)evolved to buying an usable cert, but not having the private key? How do you survive large scale DDOS? AFAICT most service providers will ditch you, since you are hurting their other customers. More ontopic, Snowden has nearly meeelion twatter actor followers and some of them call him "traitor", not sure how he deals with the twatter spam. IIRC (from Snowden's dox) the dear NSA infiltrated some? CC of botnets, so they can use them for any kind of DDOS. -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. References 1. http://blog.bittorrent.com/tag/maelstrom/ 2. mailto:guninski@guninski.com