wut? you didn't expect us to actually do anything, did you? (:
   Crowdfunding + marketing smoke was the whole business plan. The only
   actual people involved left back in 2014 when it became clear the ship
   wasn't going anywhere because said ship didn't even exist in the first
   place.
   The founder's hotness is their only asset.

   On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 1:41 PM, Martin Becze <[1]mjbecze@gmail.com>
   wrote:

   >somewhat off
   Yeah the founder went/is crazy, there is no technical work done and all
   of the developers that were working on the project quite.

   On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 4:30 PM, Lodewijk andré de la porte
   <[2]l@odewijk.nl> wrote:

   It's documentation is overly verbose, speculative, assuming and
   unclear.
   I love the idea of providing services that the government usually tends
   to.
   I somewhat know what marriage before God means. I somewhat know what
   marriage before the State means. I have no idea what marriage before
   the Blockchain means. Probably no more than lovers' tree-carvings.
   Relationship to reality is the hardest part - it's also where things
   like enforcement starts turning it's ugly head.
   I'd argue marriage before state is an artifact of the marriage between
   church and state. Relationships, commitments, etc, these would be
   better explained in contract. Contracts can go onto a blockchain.
   Generic. Neat. Unpretentious.
   Bitnation is fascinating, thought provoking, but it seems somewhat off.

   --
   Brenda Fernández
   [3]me@brendafernandez.com
   GPG: [4]CE5BEE6C81FCA4D4

References

   1. mailto:mjbecze@gmail.com
   2. mailto:l@odewijk.nl
   3. mailto:me@brendafernandez.com
   4. http://pgp.mit.edu/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xCE5BEE6C81FCA4D4