ok zenaan ur way 2 intelligent for everyone ...we get it but....
   On Sun, Aug 2, 2015 at 2:13 PM,
   odinn <[1]odinn.cyberguerrilla@riseup.net> wrote:

     -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
     Hash: SHA1
     Not sure if someone already mentioned this, but what
     of [2]opencores.org ?
     Which offers professional support for products from that site,

   why cant you yak your head (while slapping it) off about solution?
   [f18dQhb0S7ks8dDMPbW2n0x6l2B9gXrN7sKj6v5dfb6W5vwkZs7fZjrnW2BpKgF2zlZNzW
   8v-hnY1k1H6H0?si=5459291358625792&amp;pi=0b416a4c-ddd4-418b-d072-4fda9e
   587943]

   On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 2:22 AM, Zenaan Harkness <[3]zen@freedbms.net>
   wrote:

     On 8/2/15, Lodewijk andré de la porte <[4]l@odewijk.nl> wrote:
     > We will not get 50% of the population to use semi-good-crypto.
     Assuming you define TBB as semi-good crypto, the block AIUI to
     Mozilla
     incorporating Tor plugins/ mods into Firefox by default is simply
     that
     the Tor network cannot scale Internet wide. Yet. Because of course
     you
     know then we'd all be secure.
     But what do you define as semi-good crypto?
     > Far more
     > than that just do not give any damns at all.
     Agreed. But they might give some dollars for shiny new handset.
     > Legal protection for those that make insecure shit is so huge that
     society
     > is literally stacked against privacy as a whole. The
     "protected-consumer"
     > culture has led to widespread market failure - rather than think
     people buy
     > with their hearts. Simply put, "Think Different" turned into
     "Don't think
     > at all".
     You think you think? Bah! Thinking's overrated.
     > That said, I don't see why there's no company attempting to
     address the
     > niche of "I want it truly secure".
     Because there's no such thing as "truly secure" and marketing to the
     "I want it truly secure" crowd would likely result in deception,
     which
     due to the overly paranoid nature of such crowd, would quickly
     deconstruct the bullshit anywya.
     > Wouldn't governments like if the US
     > doesn't spy on them?
     Making a lot of assumptions there - such as "there are few enough
     politicians who are compromised (with sex or money), that the rest
     can
     stand strong in the face of the few".  Although the very recent
     French
     and Italian delegations to Crimea suggest at least some are capable
     of
     on the ground analysis in the face of the rest of their respective
     parliaments. Who knows, next we might see Greece running a
     referendum
     so the people can decide what their government should be doi... oh,
     hang on...
     > Wouldn't large companies' officers be very happy with
     > a secure e-mail/voice call system?
     And a way to get rid of those compromising images held by their
     respective national governments...
     > If it runs Android apps (protip: Android's JVM is open source) in
     a more
     > secure manner (like, uhm, in-hardware-sandboxing? Libre Hypervisor
     CPU with
     > the OS on it, and a jailed EvilCorp coprocessor that does the
     Android
     > stuff?) it doesn't seem to take that much to build a smartphone
     nowadays
     > (looking at Chinaphones, that is).
     <slaps forehead>
     Of course! We've all missed that obvious for so long - put JVM in a
     secure open source hypervisor and the world will be safe. That would
     even encourage me to be less sarcastic.
     > And, many of the people that want it "truly secure" will
     understand that
     > the products will cost more than a mass-produced NSA sponsored
     unit.
     Perhaps Google could kick this project off - they already own
     Android
     and they must have the dollars. In fact Intel could produce the CPU,
     Foxconn can build the handsets, Google can install the software and
     the NSA can deliver them to us^B^B^B sorry, the Postal Service can
     deliver them to us.
     We have a plan for a better world. It starts with money. Money and
     trust. Trust. But not without money. More money. And technology.
     Technology and money. I'll leave you to contact Goog to start this
     ball rolling.

   --
   Cari Machet
   NYC 646-436-7795
   [5]carimachet@gmail.com
   AIM carismachet
   Syria +963-099 277 3243
   Amman +962 077 636 9407
   Berlin +49 152 11779219
   Reykjavik +354 894 8650
   Twitter: @carimachet <[6]https://twitter.com/carimachet>
   7035 690E 5E47 41D4 B0E5 B3D1 AF90 49D6 BE09 2187
   Ruh-roh, this is now necessary: This email is intended only for the
   addressee(s) and may contain confidential information. If you are not
   the
   intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use of this
   information, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this email
   without
   permission is strictly prohibited.

References

   1. mailto:odinn.cyberguerrilla@riseup.net
   2. http://opencores.org/
   3. mailto:zen@freedbms.net
   4. mailto:l@odewijk.nl
   5. mailto:carimachet@gmail.com
   6. https://twitter.com/carimachet