2015-04-02 0:32 GMT+09:00 Stephen D. Williams <[1]sdw@lig.net>:

   Since the First Amendment is strained here, reasonable people could
   conclude that the conflicting law is unconstitutional.  That could lead
   to a sense of responsibility to do the right thing.

   What's this First Amendment thing that I have absolutely no protection
   from? Oh, right, something American! Geez, don't you Americans realize
   the constitution is something of a moral code that you should uphold in
   law and practice, with force (hint: guns, militia's) if need be?
   Anyway, again, unless you're one of the fortuitous/doomed 322 million
   people that have a US citizenship this grants NO PROTECTION AT ALL
   EVER. Not even when in the US or whilst using a US service. FISA and
   "National Security Letters" prove the threadbare legal holdfasts
   snapped ages ago anyway. I would swear there was something compelling
   the people to revolt when the government acts against the people/the
   public's interests, but I cannot find it now. Filter bubble or a lively
   imagination, who knows what to blame.

     works... IF EVERYONE cooperates to flaunt, flaut, and disregard it.
     Could you IMAGINE the gubmint trying to take every internet provider
     and
     major website operating in the US to court?
     Shut down Twitter and Yahoo!'s US ops?
     Really!

   Have you heard of "punitive punishment"? Do you know the percentage of
   people breaking the Computer Fraud Act? What about Copyright? How many
   people have been selectively convicted of drug use? (bonus points for
   racial profiling!)
   Simply put: oh no, you are so, so very wrong.

     But then, one simply doesn't do business in Australia that needs
     warrant
     canaries. What am I missing?

   Uhh.. What?...

References

   1. mailto:sdw@lig.net