It is of course well understood, these days, that paedophilia is exclusively the domain of white men. On 2 January 2015 17:37:33 GMT+00:00, Cari Machet wrote: that is a seriously narrow scope of a side topic - considering we were talking specifically about kiddie porn watching ... by old white fat men basically On Fri, Jan 2, 2015 at 1:40 PM, Mirimir <[1]mirimir@riseup.net> wrote: On 01/02/2015 01:32 AM, Cathal Garvey wrote: > Cool, the "we should be free to rape children" brand of libertarianism. > I'd entirely forgotten to add you to my devnull when I switched > hardware, thx. No, it's the "children should be free to decide when they're ready to have sex, in consultation with their parents and/or guardians" brand of libertarianism. In my experience, young men fuck literally anything that let's them, while young women have far better sense. But maybe that reflects my patriarchic childhood. > On 01/01/15 18:26, Juan wrote: >> On Thu, 1 Jan 2015 18:45:48 +0100 >> Cari Machet <[2]carimachet@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> good point - so, the US government is interested in supporting >>> (through practice) the society doing drugs and watching kiddie porn >>> sounds accurate to me - keep the populous stupid and fucked up then >>> you are left to your own devices to do whatever the fuck you want - >>> perfect plan... >> >> You seem to be missing the poing...Legislation against >> 'drugs' and so called 'age of consent' 'laws' are prime >> examples of statism. >> >> >> "you are left to your own devices to do whatever the fuck you >> want" >> >> Yeah, it's called freedom. >> >> >> >>> >>> On Thu, Jan 1, 2015 at 6:02 PM, Steve Furlong <[3]demonfighter@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> On Wed, Dec 31, 2014 at 9:20 AM, Cari Machet <[4]carimachet@gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>>> also seth it appears that dark web is 80 % estimated to be used >>>>> for >>>> child porn >>>> >>>> If I read the report correctly (and the report reported the findings >>>> correctly), the estimate was that 83% of dark web searches related >>>> to child porn. That's plausible, I suppose, though I'm certainly >>>> not taking it at face value. If I wanted to buy drugs, I already >>>> know the marketplaces to go to and don't need to search for them. >>>> >>>> Anyway, I just did my part to keep the kidzor pr0n searches up. I >>>> typed "lolita", "loli", or "loil" into a handful of onion search >>>> engines. (That last one was a typo, but the engine took it well >>>> enough.) >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Neca eos omnes. Deus suos agnoscet. -- Arnaud-Amaury, 1209 >>>> >>> >>> >>> >> > -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. References 1. mailto:mirimir@riseup.net 2. mailto:carimachet@gmail.com 3. mailto:demonfighter@gmail.com 4. mailto:carimachet@gmail.com