Isn't the foundation only as effective as its ability to liaise with
   major pool operators?

   On Wed, Nov 5, 2014 at 3:58 AM, Lodewijk andré de la porte
   <[1]l@odewijk.nl> wrote:

     Without Gavin on board there's very little sense to the Bitcoin
     Foundation. What could it to except foster corporate interests?

     On the other hand, it was made to foster early adopter interest. And
     isn't it doing mostly fine?

   On Nov 5, 2014 9:32 AM, "grarpamp" <[2]grarpamp@gmail.com> wrote:

     [3]http://upstart.bizjournals.com/entrepreneurs/hot-shots/2014/11/04
     /cody-wilson-to-run-for-bitcoin-foundation-board.html?page=all

   --
   [4]Twitter | [5]LinkedIn | [6]GitHub | [7]TravisBiehn.com | [8]Google
   Plus

References

   1. mailto:l@odewijk.nl
   2. mailto:grarpamp@gmail.com
   3. http://upstart.bizjournals.com/entrepreneurs/hot-shots/2014/11/04/cody-wilson-to-run-for-bitcoin-foundation-board.html?page=all
   4. https://twitter.com/tbiehn
   5. http://www.linkedin.com/in/travisbiehn
   6. http://github.com/tbiehn
   7. http://www.travisbiehn.com/
   8. https://plus.google.com/+TravisBiehn