2014-10-17 20:26 GMT+02:00 Bill St. Clair <[1]billstclair@gmail.com>:

     I'm surprised that anybody obeys these gag orders. Better to just
     publicize the warrant far and wide, and make it known that you'll
     kill anybody who tries to enforce the gag order. Hey. Do you want to
     live forever?

   Calm down there Spikey! Very wild west attitude. Proper governance and
   peace still beat that. Contracts can be awesome!

     I believe the best policy would be to determine your own belief.
     Assuming your belief is that gag orders are bullshit and canaries
     are
     stupid games, then:
     Inform council you will be taking such position, identify any legal
     basis/test such as first amandement / rights.
     Wait for warrant, order, NSL, FISA, exigence argument.
     Publish it, with/without whatever redactions you see fit, to
     whomever/all you see fit.
     See what happens.
     Nothing better than a stand up fight.
     (Never underestimate the power of the 1st).

   Now, this is legit advice. FISA would likely wreck you though. The
   whole design is pretty ripe for corruption. Thing is also, they
   genuinely believe they're enhancing public safety and all that. If the
   Commander in Chief thinks this is a good idea, who's to stop democracy
   from giving the people what they want*?
   Reg Canaries, I don't think they work. Why would they? It depends on
   the phrasing of the gag order, of course, but indirectly saying you got
   had is still saying it, so I agree with OP's lawyer.
   * typically this somehow involves bloodshed, so I guess gag orders are
   a kindness? Maybe Bill's at the right end. Sometimes I'm so happy I'm
   not in a lesser democrazy.

References

   1. mailto:billstclair@gmail.com