re:    99% wrong  ---> judgement ---> 0.01% wrong

this is also how 'masters of the drug war' convict
entire generations to subservience and obeyance via

mass surveillance, a threat of pending prosecution
by the very people who engineered the war of drugs
against their own populations to gain total power
via cutting off, neutralizing generations below them


and using a false and unreal ethical framework to
then judge and prosecute political enemies lists

thus solidifying the ruling dictatorship, OOSOOM


(i.e. drug lord determines drug user bad for society


if they challenge authority, use legal rights, etc)

   On Tue, Dec 31, 2013 at 3:38 PM, James A. Donald
   <[1]jamesd@echeque.com> wrote:

     In practice, it is pretty obvious that most practitioners of civil
     disobedience believe they are above the law, that they usually *are*
     above the law, and that in particular Swartz believed he was above
     the law, and was shocked to find that he was not.
     There might be some sincere practitioners of civil disobedience, but
     Swartz was not, and the big heroes of the civil disobedience
     brigade, Ghandi and Thoreau, were not.

References

   1. mailto:jamesd@echeque.com