// more realistic context of post-1960s worldview:
   strange-read-reply function, to paraphrase:

     In practice, it is pretty obvious that most practitioners of civil
     disobedience believe they are above the law, that they usually *are*
     above the law, and that in particular [users of illegal drugs:
     cocaine, meth, heroin, acid, ~pot; once alchohol] believed [they
     were] above the law, and [perhaps will be] shocked to find that
     [they are] not.

     There might be some sincere practitioners of civil disobedience,
     [including drug users and dealers], big heroes of the
     [counterculture and its ideological] brigade....

   or:

     In practice, it is pretty obvious that most practitioners of civil
     disobedience believe they are above the law, that they usually *are*
     above the law, and that in particular [psychiatric prescribing of
     harmful pills: "anti-psychotics", "antidepressants" etc] believed
     [they were] above the law, and [perhaps will be] shocked to find
     that [they are] not.

     There might be some sincere practitioners of civil disobedience, but
     [psychiatrists] was not, and the big heroes of the [political
     takeover] brigade....

   it is the problem of analysis: focus on the person who takes a gun
   and shoots people, not on the pills they were prescribe, the failed
   institutions surrounding them, etc. too simplistic, inaccurate model
   does not distinguish symptoms from disease, allows it to continue
   (lose accurate, empirical logical reasoning, no way to address this,
   thus loss of language, no matter encrypted comms, this situation;
   because it cannot be modeled or related to in realistic framework,
   and thus short-circuits into power games and political engineering,
   which is inherently violent and leads to those terms of resolution)
   82729   02020  82802