// someone has to be repetitious to provide proof-of-concept
   it is my belief that 'context is everything' applies to the review
   of these same issues and ideas, especially: location^3
   consider issues of mass surveillance and mass deployment
   of technical means and measures, for saturation potential so
   that getting to the target is a non-issue, zero cost essentially
   once installed (the role of infrastructure, resolving such issues
   by providing a managed platform that readily automate tasks)
   consider 'integrated surveillance' tools and capabilities in a
   blackbag context. really think a fleet of a 100 tempest vans
   exist in every city, or do the economics work against this as
   a scalable approach and require instead cellular towers or
   wi-fi antennas as a base for such activities to occur. and if
   this were possible, would it not be integrated to N-degrees
   of capability? consider electronic door locks in a context of
   black bag jobs. what if a remote software command could
   more easily unlock a car via cellular tower than a person,
   and invisibly, (this prior to them driving you off the road in
   autonomous or driverless vehicles, exciting future awaits)
   so is psychological warfare and other information operations
   by default assumed to involve teams on the ground or is it
   potentially seamlessly integrated with existing infrastructure
   and streamlined as another protocol layer that can or will be
   deployed as or if needed, in terms of threat escalation and
   what is legitimated in the given corrupt/illegal approach. if
   assuming it involves people going from point A to B there
   is little likelihood of these activities being deployed at the
   scale of mass surveillance, and yet if infrastructure itself,
   there is high likelihood or it is probable that they could be
   made economical and exist as a potential to be used as
   weapons against populations though may only target a
   few individuals in the existing context, potentially, thus
   0.00001% for more extreme and oppressive measures
   may be accurate, in that what is hacked becomes the
   person themselves, say via forced disease triggering or
   whatnot, as part of this context of hostile surveillance
   that in active and passive ways could still be deadly,
   just slow drip, over time, versus out-in-the-open where
   such attacks could be documented, proven to exist
   ystsp  isozo  bxbvi