attempt to clarify an overlapping conceptualization........
         (pseudo-truth 2 (truth N))  <===>  ((pT 2) truth N)
               [pT <---> T]                  [pT <---> T]
    ...these are the more accurate dynamics, though even moreso:
         (pseudo-truth 2 (truth N))  <===>  ((pT 2) truth N)
           [pT.binary <---> t.N)           [pT.binary <---> t.N)
   skipped a step in the diagram above, meant to correlate how pT &
   binarism
   are symbiotic and often correlate with ideology and 'closed'
   rationalizations,
   though the original approach referenced 'machine 2' that suddenly
   morphed
   into representing a 2-value or binary relation, viz. symmetry with
   machine N.
   (such frameworks probably need to be broken down into 2 or 3x more
   detail
   to actually get into the mechanisms, so these are only abstract
   sketches,
   though could be further described as structures or 'additional
   variables'...)

     though the appearance may indicate otherwise, from a biased
     perspective.
     truth would be moving throughout this system, and the emulation of
     it
     {its *mimicking* via pseudo-truth} would likewise be transferred,
     yet
     only one version is accurate at the level of verification as truth,
     while the other validates and relies upon its [signage] instead.
     this is the fundamental issue of patterns and their connection
     with truth, in a security context, as related to "information"
     and quasi-entropy, entropy-as-sign and entropy-as-truth.

   (note: wrote mask for some reason above, i think that was inadvertent
   bullshit because it makes no sense, stills do not have the words to
   describe what is going on, abstraction level too high, too confusing
   the overlapping frameworks of multiple meaning, though wanted to
   to attempt to make a correction via the diagram that follows..)
   forgot to diagram the 'information' transfer via the exchange, as the
   differing models migrate toward their associated models. in this way...
          (pT 2 (truth N))  <=:=>  ((pT 2) truth N)
                              :
                pT   <--------:-------- [pT = pT]
                              :
             [T = T]  --------:-------->   T
                              :
    such that:
          (pT 2 (truth N))  <=:=>  ((pT 2) truth N)
                              :
             [pT = pT]        :         [T = T]
                              :
             -ungrounded-              -grounded-
               relation                 relation
   also of potential relevance with regard to information
   as it relates to entropy, is the proposition that 'truth'
   precedes falsity and establishes the means to evaluate it.
   this is something i have concluded after years of thinking
   about the dynamics though have not formalized it as of yet
   though it just seems self-evident, especially in terms of
   the cosmos, everything relates in truth, and the variance
   within that structure (mutations, anomalies, errors) that
   is already established in a foundation built within and
   upon shared truth as framework- literally, ~continuum as
   truth relates to circuitry, informational scaffolding.
   this easily gets into Sartre or Heidegger metaphysics,
   of being and non-being (then related to nothing), as it
   also involves truth and not-truth in relation to falsity,
   though this is likewise ambiguous, with /unknowns/ and
   other fundamental concepts like partial-truth, pseudo-truth
   (one in the same, in some cases, depending upon if it is
   distinguished and-or purified as truth, removed of error
   or structurally reliant upon it for a given view or relation).
   snooker, eight ball, trickshot