On 2.10.2013 21:23, Jim Bell wrote:

      What if, for example, the Feds were no longer able to prosecute
   70,000 people per year (the current figure, approximately), but instead
   were limited to, say, 5,000 per year?
          Jim Bell

   Jim, this argument does not work and it is really dangerous because :
   - if there is some totalistic system/strong law enforcing, than
   atmosphere of terror could destroy whatever people try during time
   - there where already "electronic terrorism" raids and prosecutions in
   cases like 4chan/anonymous when LOIC was used - a lot of people just
   joined DDoSing of some servers and they where thinking "we are many, no
   problem" and it was
   So I find this argument serously dangerous, because "System" is just
   gristmill and relatively a lot of time, to finish its job.
   Basically LAW against BC should not be approved by society.
   ~ Over
--
“Borders I have never seen one. But I have heard they exist in the minds of some
 people.”
  ―     Thor Heyerdahl


[1]www...................http://overdrive.a-nihil.net
twitter...............https://twitter.com/#!/idoru23
[2]GoogleTalk/Jabber.....tpetru@gmail.com
last.fm...............http://www.last.fm/user/overdrive23
GnuPG public key......http://overdrive.a-nihil.net/overdrive.txt
GnuPG key FingerPrint.072C C0AD 88EF F681 5E52 5329 8483 4860 6E19 949D

References

   1. http://www...................http://overdrive.a-nihil.net
   2. mailto:GoogleTalk/Jabber.....tpetru@gmail.com