First, I am not aware that the CP list has ever been limited solely to
   something that can be strictly labelled as "cryptography".
   Second: Fortunately, I just uploaded an item about Lavabit and its
   operator Levison.  Those of us who are truly interested in security (as
   opposed to those who merely pretend to be, and are actually shills of
   government) understand that his crypto strength is rather pointless if
   the operator of a trusted service can be strong-armed by a government.
   What I've just invented is a method to make it about 18 times harder
   for the government to threaten somebody with prosecution for anything
   he might choose to do.  (Conviction rate going from 70,000 to 4,000 per
   year.)  But that should have been obvious to anybody.  Why wasn't it
   obvious to you?
           Jim Bell
     __________________________________________________________________

   From: Al Billings <albill@openbuddha.com>
   To: "cypherpunks@cpunks.org" <cypherpunks@cpunks.org>
   Sent: Wednesday, October 2, 2013 10:22 PM
   Subject: Re: Injustice: Denial of Disservice Attack
   >What does this have to do with cryptography?
   --
   >Al Billings
   http://makehacklearn.org
   On Wednesday, October 2, 2013 at 9:02 PM, Jim Bell wrote:

       "INJUSTICE: DENIAL of DISSERVICE ATTACK"

   or, "How to really mess up the opponent, and to do so
   legally"           By Jim Bell, Author of 'Assassination Politics'.