Does it look encrypted?

   ilsa bartlett <ilsa@jpsecure.net> wrote:

Thank You all...
is this encrypted?  grin, ilsa
On 7/22/13 4:42 AM, John Young wrote:

     Opposition, disgust, revulsion, ridicule toward al-qaeda
     is perfectly cypherpunkian. Never, ever unanimous nor
     what's acceptable without merciless, obnoxious, off-topic
     digression argument. "Fuck that to death." - A Sage
     "Cypherpunks" -- the name, the adventure, the rise and
     fall, and multiple rebirths and splits and plagiarisms --
     has been subjected to as much irrational ridicule and
     exploitation as hyper-plagiarized "al-qaeda."
     "Cryptography" list is a bastard of a bastard of a bastard
     of cypherpunks, each iteration trying to act snooty
     about villanous cryptography and failing repeatedly to
     hide its cypherpunkian malice.
     There are thousands of vile and sapp y posts in the
     cpunk archives as with the "fucked to death and still
     going" internet. Crud begets crud. Delete the crud and
     there's nothing left of the shit-hole except the gargantuan
     cesspools on Wayback and Wikipedia and Tor "hidden
     services" and blacknet and undernet and [1]intel.net and
     virulent cheating, lying and fucking users and each
     other.
     Extra good shit:, big data crud is growing exponentially,
     a golden bowl of explosive fertilizer likely leading to
     global cyberwar over who runs the cess.
     Never ask for permission, never give it.
     Cross-sub everybody and spy them secretly.
       _______________________________________________________________

     Clean the nasty crud out of the tub for a nice safe enjoyable bath
     [2]http://click.lavabit.com/p8imkxuf9mikcjhwibi6kzfi3ni6azuc1maqbg6d
     arzsm5gzhity/
       _______________________________________________________________

   --
   Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.

References

   1. http://intel.net/
   2. http://click.lavabit.com/p8imkxuf9mikcjhwibi6kzfi3ni6azuc1maqbg6darzsm5gzhity