FreeSpeech and Censorship: Thread

[grarpamp]

1984 and Internet... never short of twisted things...

Ever notice how whenever anyone popular with the people speaks out
against the corruption, nonsense, hypocrisy, and evil operations of
the Deep State and Globalist powers...

Rumble is still standing for now, most other big commercial platforms
have caved to demonetization, downranking, censorship, and outright
deletion and permabans.

Twitter X Tesla and Elon are under massive assult,
SpaceX only survives because Govts depend on it to fuck each other
and you over, but they're all being commanded now to perform illegal
racist "migrant" hiring practices, prosecuted [forced] by US Democrats.

Rumble, Bitchute, Odyssey, and a few other distributed
and alt-platforms, those are the only survivors, for now.


"
What about Tara Reade whose alleged rape by Joe Biden was apparently
not a rape because she'd once expressed some positive views about
Putin?
"

"
Funny how Russel has been in the spotlight his entire career, and only
now gets allegations against him after he rants about political
corruption and endless wars. Exposing the real enemy will result in
demonizing. It's obvious.
"

"
It seems to me the people are already doing something about it seeing
as though the legacy media is dying off before our very eyes. The news
was the establishment’s most powerful tool to program the masses and
they are now rapidly losing that ability thanks to the internet. This
is why wannabe fascists are so desperate to censor their political
opponents’ online accounts no matter how shameless it makes them look.
"

"
Op illustrates a good point. The gross inbalance in what is deemed a
criminal act and what is not. Its the usual story of slight-of-hand
and focusing on anything other than actually what is important. Yes,
rape is important but I rather see an in depth breakdown of the events
leading up to the invasion of Ukraine. I want to see the backhand
business deals going on with Biden there in Ukraine, I want NATO to be
held accountable for inciting Russia by fucking around on the
expansion treaty. And I want all that on the news until we get to the
truth. But that can all be fucked off with because the powers don't
want us to know. Instead, we get fed dog shit and were meant to feel
full.
"


"
His ratio of volume vs quality of information is different than
Assange, but it's just as harmful to the narrative. The average
suburban housewife doesn't know wikileaks, but they're aware of Brand.
The point of this post is what's not being covered. We've got the
names of Brand's accusers; let's see the names in Maxwell's book.
"

"
Hollywood and mainstream media loves you with you are a degenerate
drug and sex addict.
As soon as you get married, have children, get sober, find God, and
start speaking truth, then they want to destroy you for having lived
their value system and left it.
"

"
This bullshit with Brand is such a clear smear campaign it makes me
what to puke. I myself being a victime of unsolicitated sexual acts, i
DID NOT wait fucking 20 years and oh, stay annonymous by that, to file
a complaint.. i can understand fear and shit but Naw man.. this makes
it even harder for people, Men and women, who have been SA victims to
be taken seriously.. and what about INNOCENT TILL PROVEN GUILTY?!?!?!
Youtube has put a demonitization on everything Russell will post now
its clear they want him quiet and subdued because he speaks up against
all their bullshit and now people are looking towards them. They dont
like that!
So they are doing everything to shut him up and shoot him down. I will
keep supporting him and this will not stop their little disgusting
actions to see the day, sooner rather then later.
"

"
I'll start caring whether or not Russell Brand had some questionable
sex a decade or 2 ago when the media starts caring what Bill Gates or
Prince Andrew was doing on Epstein's island, or when it starts naming
the customers Ghislaine Maxwell was convicted of supplying trafficked
minors to.

And I'll care about what one former US president is or isn't guilty of
when the media starts caring what other former US presidents are or
are not guilty of (or even what the current one's been up to lately).

And I'll care about a more powerful country invading a less powerful
country when the media reports the conflict and its context in exactly
the same tone and with the same degree of neutrality versus moral
outrage as it uses when the more powerful country in question is the
USA (or any other NATO member).

Until that day, the mainstream media and everyone who repeats its
talking points on social media is nought but idle gossip and the sound
of one hand clapping.

Until that day I could not give less fucks about who the msm says any
fucker fucked or didn't fuck, so fuck the msm. Let anyone it fucks
with tell it to fuck the fuck off with its farcical fuckery.

This is primarily, but not only, a British thing. It's British
television and British media that are doing most of the smearing.
Brand is British. He was employed at Channel 4 at the time Channel 4
now alleges he was committing the alleged sex offences.

Channel 4 made accusations and insinuations in their program that are
contradicted by their own more defensive statements when responding to
enquiries by another British media outlet, - statements which claim
that they, Channel 4, are not aware of any allegations or complaints
having been made to them against Brand at the time in question.

Brand also worked for the BBC at the time the alleged events took place.

So neither organisation reported on Brand when he was working for them
- even though that was when the alleged events took place - but now
that he has a market share of audience for contemporary events and
discussion which works against them - in the sense that they think by
rights that should be their audience, tuning in to the messages that
they choose to put out - now, they have something to report.

I dare say if you're not from the UK, you don't have the full
background of how all this has played out. Brand was a household name
in the UK long before his streaming content regularly attracted
audiences of several millions. The UK media establishments of which he
was once a part are not taking kindly to their former employee
striking out on his own and contradicting their oligarch-sponsored
messaging, especially as his shows are popular with members of the
British public who no longer trust the established UK media brands. In
some ways the problem for those players is that Brand is now a rival
brand.
"


"
Maybe you are autistic or something but clearly his point is this
media frenzy surrounding Russel Brand did not show the same moral
outrage and narcissistic grandstanding when these things were coming
out about Epstein island and Ghislaine Maxwell. Where the fuck are the
two year media investigations into THESE FAR MORE IMPORTANT ISSUES?
Instead people would rather gossip like pathetic worms about some
celebrity former drug addict who is far less influential THAN
BILLIONAIRE ELITES involved in blackmail intelligence operations to
control politics. Imagine if these "journalists" spent the time
pulling those threads instead of playing defense for the REAL ELITE
BILLIONAIRES who pay their salaries. Pathetic that your average
American is so dumbed down they cannot see the creeping fascism
staring them in the face. Snitch culture is a product of Nazi Germany
where they would find dirt on anyone criticizing their regime and then
use the media which they owned to destroy that person. Do you not find
it the least bit curious that these accusations are coming out now
when this man has been the most vocal in his opposition to the current
establishment? Do you not think intelligence agencies like the CIA
keep a close watchful eye on influential people with large audiences
and then undermine or sabotage people opposing their own attempts to
socially engineer culture? Use your head. If this was anything but a
coordinated attack, this would have all come out years ago WHEN HE WAS
WORKING AT THOSE COMPANIES and WHEN HE WAS A BIGGER CELEBRITY THAN HE
IS NOW. The only reason it is coming out now is because he ruffled
some powerful feathers and they needed to destroy him because they are
more afraid of people actually listening to what he is saying and
awakening to the reality of what these elites are doing and have
planned.
"

"
They’re only going after Brand because he speaks the truth and it’s
not in their favor. His following had gotten too big and he is against
big Pharma (the vaccine). They have to shut him up. Danny Masters got
railroaded on a 22 yr old accusation of nothing more than he said/she
said. ZERO evidence whatsoever. If you haven’t learned by now that the
left and the elite in power will destroy any obstacle in their way, by
whatever means necessary. Create a virus and a pandemic, create a
deadly vaccine, Epstein your ass, car accident, shot in the back,
execute you in your home, accused rapist, and so on. Brand is their
newest threat.
"

"
So, Huw Edwards, famous BBC anchor, was outed less than three months
ago for soliciting naked pictures from a 17 year old boy. And sending
naked pictures to him. He's a married man with several kids.

The media circled the wagons for him, didn't report it, and let him
use "mental health" as an excuse when he freaked out after it was
exposed.

He was supposedly investigated and it was determined no laws were broken.

So no one should pretend like there's equal justice, Hue Edwards is a
pervert at best, and a likely pedophile. Compare and contrast to how
much publicity Brand is getting.

• In separate claims, the newspaper published messages the presenter
allegedly sent to a 17-year-old after initiating a conversation on
Instagram in October 2018.

Latest figures released on Tuesday confirmed his six-figure salary as
being between £435,000 and £439,999 a year, making him the
highest-paid journalist at the corporation.

Meanwhile, both the Metropolitan Police in London and South Wales
Police have confirmed that, after looking into some of the
allegations, detectives have found no evidence of a crime being
committed and are not taking any further action.

Edwards allegedly paid a teenager more than £35,000 for sexually
explicit photos over a three-year period.

Edwards allegedly sent threatening messages to a young person in their
early 20s, who has no connection to the person at the centre of The
Sun's story, the BBC previously reported.

The star met the young person on a dating app before their
conversations moved to other platforms, according to the corporation.

He then revealed his identity and asked the young person not to tell
anyone, BBC News said.

The newspaper said it had seen messages suggesting the presenter
visited the person's home, sent cash and asked for a picture - and was
sent a semi-naked photo.

https://news.sky.com/story/everything-we-know-about-huw-edwards-scandal-12917471
"

"
Regardless of what Mr Brand is accused of none of the accusations
compares to grooming a 14 year old boy waiting and eventually putting
a human sausage up his bum when he was of legal age like Philip
Schofield. That's like Woody Allen level of disgusting. There are real
nonce's out there like those who you've mentioned and much worse
living life on Easy St
"

"
i will care when everything is equal and nothing is political and we
work to root out all corruption.
"