Dishonest Tor relay math question - tor-talk is to lazy

grarpamp grarpamp at gmail.com
Wed Mar 1 02:24:47 PST 2023


/2

https://arxiv.org/pdf/1801.02265.pdf
https://arxiv.org/pdf/1808.07285v1.pdf

These two papers are over five years old.
Tor Project Incorporated knew about them and their classes of attacks
and refused to tell their users about them and the risks to their safety.
Tor Project Incorporated also refused to tell their $donors about these
papers and Tor's failure to bother addressing them.
Yet no media ever wonders why or bothers to call them out.
https://twitter.com/NameRedacted247 #TwitterFiles
In fact, the media, which have been proven to be agents
of the deep state, often cheers Tor, and media like the NYT
run onion leak drop sites, while correlators watch their connections
like hawks.



"... they can correlate ... this was understood ...
not just when we first made Tor, but for pre-Tor versions of onion routing.
... the paper being discussed substantially improves [attacks]
...
... reduce your sense of alarm
...
... the novelty is somewhat overstated
-- Paul Syverson  US Military Employee 2023/02"

Lol

Tor Project Executives and Principal devs knew,
yet still foisted, and are still foisting, Tor upon the world anyway.

And Tor Project Inc removed all warnings about tor from their frontpage
and other places over decade ago.

Tor Project Inc has placed tor users at risk.


More information about the cypherpunks mailing list